one considers X to be a possibility.
might have their own ways to become wind.

is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.

How an algorithm has become wind?

is this a call for some kind of an realism?

probably not so much a call but an interrogativity in itself?

how about an ISm? InterrogativIsm?

How about collapse?
An interrogative collapse?

..and so on

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!