Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.
How an algorithm has become wind?
curious how the dada name became a quintessential art def.
their way of defining art comes curious imho as well.
it's a mix of the ai themselves, plus the Kantian beauty taken as art via "in my opinion it's art, hence it's art" approach directed at images produced.
yet, they had to use "reflection" term.
i think it's definitely art based on laws of violence. i have power to force an opinion therefore it is. perhaps an approach befitting our violence based culture??
trying to find a n interesting angle.
debugging seems to assume a fair bit..
Life without bugs is, kinda, err, lifeless..
debugging has to produce new bugs.
However, these are bugs only when there's a purpose..
what's a buggy wind?