Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.
How an algorithm has become wind?
in case you read and go - wtf is X. so yes, exactly that. it's meaningless without the possibility to generate any meaningfulness without a violence to support it
therefore meaningfulness is meaning that Can reflect upon itself without folding.
ie without some kind of tautological x is x cause x is x by x thats always x with x, so x is x.
meaning, like money, is an exit?
id like to think of understanding as a communion but i am alone.
From Georges Bataille or William Burroughs to Electronic Arts and Catherine Christer Hennix...
The psychanalyst, Franck Ancel, invite you for a free meeting in english, on real time, from Australia with Tim Themi to Canada with Marcus Boon and from US with David Schwarz to Sweden with Vanessa Sinclair, by Paris with Nicolas Ballet to four continents "online" with Jacques Lacan and the arts.
Saturday 9th october 2pm Paris time Zoom link https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86012117514
how many people takes to make a category?