Pinned toot

Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language

Pinned toot

?
one considers X to be a possibility.
might have their own ways to become wind.

(??!!)
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.

How an algorithm has become wind?

a wishful thinking?
a hyperstition that isn't?
a bubble? who's bubble?

however
if we go out of the move - a d&g notion of trajectories in life -
are there
any
faster
quicker
ways across spacetime?
Entanglement?

?

sure
development is a part of any given evolutionary process.
yes.
however
developments come within the said processes.

Since we may know that evolution will indeed kick in with it's blindness
is too slow
since it will require
accelerations in multiple directions.

however you look at this,
imho
is
too
slow
since it fails to account for evolution's blindness.

Unless somehow acceleration is outside of evolution
an extra evolutionary development

then how does it account for evolution?
Processes that, staying with movement trajectories metaphor, may go - and do -
in any given direction?
Basically by saying that we may force evolution into x rather than y direction.
Just that, hold on,
that's not evolution.
its development.

why do i think is too slow???

Whether one fancies of the left/progressive or the right/nrx kind
the common link is something like:

Hey! there's a move in a certain Trajectory -
Lets make it faster
so fast
that
will
break.

al-right/nrx claims human will end with capitalism -
enter the

left/progressive claims capitalism will end through techs - eg - that will end it's seeming necessity.

there is a human history of telling ourselves there are Islands, lands, places we could go to and rid ourselves of the difficulties we - as an X group - experience.

Might be interesting to imagine - for example an Imagined Island - from the view of that which is imagined?

ie.. Plastic bottles imagine themselves coming together to create a floating island?

Floatingness - the sensation - imagines living as an island?

hummm..
note to whoever?

how Meta as in
a the processes of x rather than x -
may escape appearing if not
living
AS
existentialist traps?

perhaps the way out of this false dichotomy is
through a different Kind
of
advice?
Question?
How to question?
Questioning questions how to question?

can someone authentically advice another
to
take
no advice?

{
since advices perceive life as a repeating
machine
- in such and such situation,
do dis and dat
-
which, since machines are not alive,
we get a contradiction in terms..
}
yet..?

a delayed Duh!?
When humans utter
I believe
such and such
fib or otherwise

many occations
what they say is
that they think such and such in a way that
isn't for their personal gain.

hence
when a male looking human
tells
a female looking human
that
they Believe in their musical talents
the
singer may indeed feel a bit disoriented when
it turns out
the belief was more to the tune of
saying anything for a fuck.

in my mind
it's kind of an

Show more
artoot?

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!