非 아 하 ああ 논 ノン アハ @ahanon@artoot.xyz
Pinned toot
Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language
Pinned toot
#speculative?
one considers X to be a possibility.
#algorithms might have their own ways to become wind.
#interrogative(??!!)
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.
How an algorithm has become wind?
i wonder what happens in cultures when women seem to have no option but cover faces..
are there rape flashbacks?
in case there are - any assistance offered?
there are lies one may not want to hear,
and other kind that they do rather fancy!
gosh
humans do like being entertained - even if it takes to the grave..
thats actually a bit insightful..
they say that humans may know something to be
a lie
or
not entirely true
yet
will not care that much since
what ever they hear
makes them feel
good.
A bit like hearing:
You Look Fab!!!
Knowing the utterance is only since someone thinks it'll get them a lay..
And
indeed trying to believe that utterance..
in other words
is it the nature of future
to be technological
or
a human nature to
think future as
technological..?
question is,
suppose the future is technological oriented.
is the future for an X technology's mind
technological as well?
in case of a future
humans tend to consider
Futures
in terms of technologies
suppose there is a future
