Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.
How an algorithm has become wind?
fancy some tea? Mate?
sure. we might not like the idea of sports-like supporting in #politics -
however, when all that seems to matter in politics is to get hold of power, and much of chatter is of who may win/lose rather than how ideas and notions may evolve in our lives and cultures differently -
should one be ridiculed when perceptively they take the political process as a game
they are asked to support X or Z?
feeling hopeful? fancy singing?
they seem to have an open call for #artists to take part via sending material to furnish some of the exhibited works' content..
an open call
spaces of solidarity
it seems perhaps there is a need to either define soft-fascism clearer
get a different new term that gets rid
since when the historical reference is slightly vague and speculative at best -
the severity of what is going on seems to slip away..
im a read?