Since, imho, meanings themselves are noisy. They rely on power to keep going. Hence when one might point at the insincerity from a politician urging Love of country while pillaging it's resources (aka bojo)
One could do well recalling that the very way by which such thoughts may make things clear, relies on violent training of people to use that very language
is to accept the fact that X has escaped one way or another, once uttered, noticed, or was missed.
Hence we are left with questioning how X collapses
- it's rhythmicalablity of vibrations, frictions and intervals.
How an algorithm has become wind?
i wonder what happens in cultures when women seem to have no option but cover faces..
are there rape flashbacks?
in case there are - any assistance offered?
fake and news with w churchill?
i think bojo tells such soothing lies as well..
there are lies one may not want to hear,
and other kind that they do rather fancy!
humans do like being entertained - even if it takes to the grave..
thats actually a bit insightful..
they say that humans may know something to be
not entirely true
will not care that much since
what ever they hear
makes them feel
A bit like hearing:
You Look Fab!!!
Knowing the utterance is only since someone thinks it'll get them a lay..
indeed trying to believe that utterance..
in other words
is it the nature of future
to be technological
a human nature to
think future as
suppose the future is technological oriented.
is the future for an X technology's mind
technological as well?
in case of a future
humans tend to consider
in terms of technologies