Show more

seems so:
if we consider computer language as an work
eg
sonicPi
there's a requirement - seemingly technical - of a particular environment to run the thing.
Sure,
it's miles away from the specificities of ephemeral, conceptual and context oriented -
however, its not merely technically site specific for x technologies,

-------->>>>>>>>

Show thread

somehow to your possible amazement
specificity of such and such thing/object/project/work in extends into materials that come non specific by their very nature.
really?
------->>>>>>>

Show thread

when learning about ephemeral you notice that
you supposedly either missed it - since you weren't there, for example, when such and such fog was in an art focus in "fog x flo".
Or that you should have been to the documenting exhibition,
or
that when you watch a documenting film -
it's always About and never the Thing in Itself.

------>>>>>>

Show thread

and non specific life?

In fact, the non specificity, the lack of need for a specifically particular object seem to permeate through much of human activities until we come to activities that have to do with that which humans call
.

Sure, you may consider site specific stuff to be forever
connected to the sites they are at.
However specificity doesn't stop with sites, it goes to objects
when a painting isn't the particular approved one - then something is wrong!

----->>>>>

Show thread

specific non ?

When you learned Pi -
there was no need to get Pythagoras own writings about the subject - scribbling things by yourself in a notebook with your name on it is just as good!

Even this e= m cSq
while written slightly clumsily - does the magic of offering the calculation that altered science big time,
there is no fundamental difference between your equation and that of any other child or, in fact, that of Einstein's.

---->>>>

Show thread

nonspecific ?

Through these means, you continue to learn. Since both the intelligence and humans are kind anthropo oriented,
you get to study stuff to do with humans.

However, during learning, something slightly odd and strange seem to become apparent without many apparatuses:

When you read the original Frankenstein book
all that was required is the text - even if it flickers in ways Mary Shelly never fathomed.

--->>>

Show thread

non specific ?

lets try to shoot the motion into non specific art through checking the followings' vitality:

say you are a poor child that somehow managed to live as the last survivor upon a death infected spececraft drifting into space.

Your luck, as it may be, is that: * - the spacecraft grows all food and drink you possibly need;
* - the local intelligence functions allowing a connection to their data, the inter-galactic-net and
some humans.

--->>

a and question.

Is there a hashtag, conversation going, regarding

How to reflect, imagine and react when so many
Authoritarian oriented forces have now realised that
centralised internet may cut their agenda off the public sphere?

How to consider An Open Letter to Open-Letters?
An Open Letter to Open-Letters - How to consider?

1 -  How to find Ph in a cafe?

2 - Re-Searching for Open-Letters?

3 - Open-letters and windows to cosmic windings?

4 - Power to helplessness and the other way around?

5 - Who are Fs and Ph?

6 - Gods, machines and exo intelligences?

7 - How to worry about Open Letters?

8 - How Ph and Fs find aha?

9

itchy.5p.lt/how-to-consider-an

a fake truly honest switch believer in ammon amen and mainly A women?
A few days ago, a politician run a pray in which they mentioned the traditional
Amen

However, they summoned an inclusive spirit in their minds. A call that concluded
Amen has something to do with
men.
Hence in the spirit of Inclusivity - why not
Awomen?

Initially, I thought:
Peh! How ignorant. (since Amen has to do wit

itchy.5p.lt/a-fake-truly-hones

Show more
artoot?

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!