another, perhaps neater way is to claim the
frict as an addition?
coffeeIct (or coffeect)
this coffeect jiv floral?
moonict jiv earth escapee?
compare with a capturing grammar?
this coffee, it is floral
this moon, it has escaped from earth
nuclear fusion.. could both solve and under capitalism - create debts galore..
Frict Jiv the Moon?
Jiv Frict the moon? ( so the life bit frames the friction?)
or better to give a more fluid way?
moon frict jiv the?
since the non priori has to do with Grammar
aka lingo magic
it could fall interesting
to use Non-Priori-Ation
the indication that we consider
as a friction aesthetics.
instead of saying
It's the Moon. (indicating the moon is both an It and in relation to gender - has no gender.)
We can say:
Frict (we are Frictioning)
Jiv (as a form of life and living indication)
into coffee? how about grinders?
The non priori has frictions
cause and effect,
The non-priori lives from and within the imagined?
My suspicion is the Non
might be the wrong - misleading - term here.
However, can we not say that we also have
The frictions that come regardless of knowledge.
Moonrise. (Moons don't rise, but in some languages.)
Some languages, stuff like numbers and moons - have gender despite the fact we know these things have nothing to do with sex and sexuality linked stuff.
Indeed - the english non gendered moon is part of the imagination around genderisation.
Moons have to do with gender as rainbows have to do with an #ai wedding.
non representational geographies?
how to disappear - cia style?