However, can we not say that we also have
The frictions that come regardless of knowledge.
Moonrise. (Moons don't rise, but in some languages.)
Some languages, stuff like numbers and moons - have gender despite the fact we know these things have nothing to do with sex and sexuality linked stuff.
Indeed - the english non gendered moon is part of the imagination around genderisation.
Moons have to do with gender as rainbows have to do with an #ai wedding.
The non priori has frictions
cause and effect,
The non-priori lives from and within the imagined?
My suspicion is the Non
might be the wrong - misleading - term here.
since the non priori has to do with Grammar
aka lingo magic
it could fall interesting
to use Non-Priori-Ation
the indication that we consider
as a friction aesthetics.
instead of saying
It's the Moon. (indicating the moon is both an It and in relation to gender - has no gender.)
We can say:
Frict (we are Frictioning)
Jiv (as a form of life and living indication)
Frict Jiv the Moon?
Jiv Frict the moon? ( so the life bit frames the friction?)
or better to give a more fluid way?
moon frict jiv the?
the jiv and ict allow us to magic the subject as both a living dynamics element (jiv) and
an evolving friction orientation with, for example, the speaker. An orientation focused on the language between the speaker/s and subjects - hence beyond questions of knowledge?
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!