some humans are defined.

Defined by music, religion, skin colours, gender, sex, desires, nationalities, financial power, family histories and the list may go on..

Other humans define.

Define
music, religion, skin colours, gender, sex, desires, nationalities, financial power, family histories and the list may go on..

Follow

so we get:

Violence to define others.
Acceptance of said violence by following definitions.
and
the attempt to define stuff is always violently borderline -
is it a project to define for humans to follow,
or to define for
the said definitions to live?

didn't consider this thread in the following way to begin with.. However, this does seem to indicate
for
art's
sake
is actually very socially engaging precisely since
it doesn't even try?

@ahanon
True

However l´art pour l´art still tries to define #art

@fragmentscenario

yes. as it was practised traditionally, it does seem like a double edged sward - at the very least :)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
artoot?

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!